Home of Rhett & Link fans - the Mythical Beasts!
Note: I'd just like To inform all of you Viewing this that I will not be Available or posting anything The first two weeks in July, as I am going to be On vacation. That's all for now.
Ah Rugrats, the Adorable show about Babies and their shenanigans. I grew up with this Show and credit it For contributing to my Love of animation. This innocent little show Is just too cute Not to like. However, this theory brings All that cuddly innocence tumbling down to Crush my childhood.
The famous Rugrats Theory stems from the Creepy Pasta Wiki site and goes Something like this:
The Rugrats were really all just a Figment of Angelica's imagination.
Not too bad Right? But wait!, there's More! The theory Goes on to tell us Why she made them up:
But what about Suzie and Dil? Well, according to the theory, Dil was the only "Real" baby in the series and Suzie, who is Angelica's only Friend, entertained her Allusions of the babies to Make her happy. These facts Make The Rugrats Theory one of The most morbid Cartoon Theories out there... it also makes It one of the Most ridiculous theories.
Clearly, this theory, Like everything else On the CreepyPasta wiki page, was made Purely to creep people out and Ruin all things Innocent. Let's look at a few episodes that Disprove this theory.
And I won't even begin To list the Numerous episodes Where the adults are Seen interacting with them and The episodes where Angelica isn't even Present. In my opinion, The Rugrats Theory is Complete Bunk. There's just Too much Evidence against it for it To be believable.
But I want to Know what you Guys think. If you have Any opinions of your Own on this Theory or My debunking of it, Feel free to leave a comment Below as well as suggestions For future Theories or Blog posts. As always, ~ DFTBA and I'll see you 'round the Verse.
© 2024 Created by Link. Powered by
You need to be a member of RhettandLinKommunity to add comments!
Join RhettandLinKommunity